The Mount Sinai Learning and Development and Development Center is a multi-disciplinary team of caring professionals specializing in the evaluation and treatment of:

  • Learning Disabilities
  • Developmental Disorders
  • Behavior Problems

Services are provided for children and adults.


 
Information for Parents
. Expert Services . The Learning and Development Team
. Neuropsychological Assessment . Other Resources
. Two Case Studies . Contact Us

  Expert Assessment and Treatment Services

The team provides state of-the-art assessment and treatment of attention and learning problems.

Comprehensive Evaluation

The core of our multi-disciplinary evaluation is a neuropsychological evaluation which includes:

  • Comprehensive analysis of the child's medical, family, and neurodevelopment history
  • Child and parents interviews
  • Psychological Testing
  • Neuropsychological Assessment

The evaluation process results in a professional assessment of:

  • Intellectual Ability
  • Academic Achievement
  • Attention and Concentration
  • Visual and Auditory Perception
  • Language
  • Memory
  • Motor Skills

Each evaluation culminates in a comprehensive written report which integrates the findings of the multidisciplinary team in a clear and easily understand manner.

The Learning and Development Center staff meets with the parent(s) to review results and recommendations. Parents are included as team members in developing an effective treatment plan for the child.

The Learning and Development Center, when appropriate, will be in communication with schools and other professionals who are involved with the child. If requested by the parents, we can coordinate our treatment plan with the school, attend CSE meetings, and provided consultation to the school.

Integrated Treatment Services

We provide a network of psychological and remedial services which meet the child's cognitive, social and behavioral needs and may include:

  • Cognitive Remediation
  • Psychotherapy or Play Therapy
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Social Skills Group
  • Parent Support Group
  • Parent Training
  • Adult ADHD support groups and cognitive remediation

Back to top


  Neuropsychological Assessment of Learning Disabilities

Neuropsychological assessment is like a window which enables us to obtain a bird's eye view of the manner in which an individual functions under a variety of conditions.

A Neuropsychological evaluation can help to determine if there is central nervous system (CNS) impairment and, if so, what are the effects of the impairment on cognitive function and behavior. The results allow us to develop appropriate remedial strategies.

 

HOW A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION DIFFERS FROM OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS

Neuropsychological research and clinical literature allow us to speculate intelligently as to what specific cognitive processes may be impaired and in what manner impairment may be present. When the CNS is intact, the individual is capable of an infinite number of permutations and combinations of cognitive skills. However, when the CNS is not integrated (i.e., impaired) there are only a finite number of ways that disorders of cognitive processes can be manifest.

Neuropsychology literature provides constructs, procedures and instruments that enable us to study those specific disorders of cognition and behavior known to be referable to CNS dysfunction. Neuropsychological "syndromes" can be observed in children which are different from the behavioral syndromes observed in children with reactive emotional disorders and are thus distinct from reactive emotional disorders.

WHAT A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION CONSISTS OF

1. Clinical interview with parents and child
2. Assessment - child is presented with a series of cognitive and motor tasks to solve (includes screening battery and core battery)
3. Integration of data for the purpose of deciding upon an appropriate diagnosis
4. Prescription of remedial measures designed to meet the specific needs of the child
5. Informing interview - This is an opportunity for the clinician to meet with the parents and convey the results of the evaluation. The mood of this meeting should be one that encourages dialogue between the clinician and the parents -- to share the clinical findings with parents and to encourage them to share their feelings with the clinician. Together, we formulate a remedial plan that will address the needs of the family as a whole.
5. Production of a written report -- It typically is promised to the parents within four weeks of the informing session.

Neuropsychological evaluation tends to focus on the following domains:
1. Attention
2. Perception
3. Language comprehension and production
4. Memory - Verbal and nonverbal recognition and recall
5. Spatial-construction
6. Executive and motor skills
7. In some cases, affect (personality dynamics and psychological functioning)

The screening battery for the school-age child referred for assessment of learning and behavior disorders consists of the WISC-III A NAMING TEST, ACHIEVEMENT TESTING; READING, SPELLING AND ARITHMETIC TESTS OF GROSS, FINE AND GRAPHOMOTOR COORDINATION. The results should enable us to determine whether a problem exists which requires further evaluation and, to some degree, directs attention towards specific troublesome areas.

Back to top


  Two Case Studies

ANOMIA - CASE STUDY: FRANK

Frank is an articulate, highly motivated, engaging 7-year-old second grader. His is a warm, loving, caring, accepting family, who bend over backward to enhance their children's self-esteem, while encouraging their independence and sense of responsibility. Frank was the last person in the world that anyone would expect to have a reading problem.

During the course of the kindergarten year his teachers expressed concern that he seemed to be uninterested in learning the sounds and names of the letters and preferred playing instead. By the middle of the first grade, when Frank still had not begun to read he was recommended for and evaluation by the Committee on Special Education of his school district. The results of that evaluation confirmed that he was dyslexic and it was recommended that Resource Room Services be provided. This year Frank entered the second grade. Progress had been minimal. His parents in desperation sought a neuropsychological evaluation in an attempt to clarify the nature and extent of Frank's deficit so that appropriate remedial measures could be instituted.

Results of the evaluation confirmed Frank's his parents' feeling that he was indeed a bright child - his IQ was in the high average range. Attention, perception, language comprehension, memory and motor functions were found to be intact. However, Frank presented with a significant word finding problem, which compromised his ability to benefit from a traditional programs designed to teach readiness skills.

The neuropsychologist consulted with the school and designed a program designed to utilize Frank's many strengths to enable him to make the necessary academic gains.

ARTICULATORY-GRAPHOMOTOR DEFICITS - CASE STUDY WILL

Will is an intelligent, articulate, ten-year-old fifth grade boy, who easily mastered beginning reading. Academic difficulties became apparent in the third grade, when reading, spelling and writing achievement unexpectedly fell below grade level. Will's teachers characterized him as a responsible, mature boy, with solid peer relationships. They were baffled by the seemingly unexplainable decline in his performance. The family pediatrician, during Will's annual assessment, joined with school personnel in recommending testing.

Neuropsychological test results confirmed Will's superior intellectual ability. In-depth assessment of language function revealed the residua of a developmentally based language problem which compromised the acquisition of the phonic skills necessary for decoding (reading) and encoding (writing) unfamiliar words. Qualitative assessment of Will's reading revealed that had adopted the compensatory technique of relying on context and the recognition of words by sight when reading unfamiliar text. While this approach had been quite successful in the early grades, when the material to be read was relatively simple, it no longer sufficed when he was required to read more complicated text. Guessing rather than sounding out unfamiliar words began to result in errors that changed the meaning of the what he was reading and made it appear as though he didn't understand what he was reading. What appeared to be a comprehension problem was, in fact, a decoding problem.

Additional testing revealed that Will presented with graphomotor discoordination, i.e., messy writing. The act of writing was an effortful process for Will, usurping attention away from the mechanics of writing (spelling, capitalization and punctuation), thereby compounding his difficulty with written expression.

Once again, the essential first step, accurate diagnosis, enabled the prescription of appropriate remedial measures to enable Will to improve his decoding skill and thus re-establish his sense of self esteem.

Back to top


  The Learning and Development Team 

David J. Marks, Ph.D. Program Director

Jeffrey H. Newcorn, M.D. Medical Director

Consultation from Mount Sinai's Departments of Pediatrics, Pediatric Neurology, Communication Disorders and other relevant services are arranged as needed.

Back to top


  Other Resources 
Psychiatry at Mount Sinai

Child Psychiatry at Mount Sinai

Pediatrics at Mount Sinai

Neurology at Mount Sinai

Mount Sinai Department of Psychiatry

Mount Sinai Department of Pediatrics

Mount Sinai Department of Neurology

Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center

National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities’ "Learn the Signs. Act Early." Program

Back to top




  Contact Us

To Find a Doctor, click here or call the toll-free Physician Referral number: 1-800-MD-SINAI.

The Mount Sinai Medical Center
Learning and Development Center
19 East 98th Street
Suite 5D
New York, NY 10029

212-241-4423

Click here for directions and a map.

Back to top