|
| Volume 70 Number 4 September 2003 |
back to
contents |
|
|
|
| Grand Rounds Evolving Rationale for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition in Chronic Heart Failure |
225-231 |
From the Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Address all correspondence to Thierry H. LeJemtel, M.D.,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue,
Forcheimer G44, Bronx, NY 10461; E-mail: lejemtel@aecom.yu.edu.
Based on a Grand Rounds presentation of the Division of
Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of
Medicine, New York, NY on April 22, 2002, and updated in February
2003.
ABSTRACT
The rationale behind the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
has evolved considerably since their approval for the treatment of hypertension.
The initial rationale behind their use for the treatment of chronic heart failure
was to duplicate with one agent the hemodynamic effects produced by the hydralazine-isosorbide
dinitrate combination,
i.e., increasing cardiac output while reducing ventricular filling pressures.
The observation that the acute hemodynamic
effects of ACE inhibitors did not predict long-term clinical benefits led to
the search for mechanisms other than
hemodynamic improvement. Attenuation or even reversal of left ventricular dilatation
after myocardial infarction, which was first reported with ACE inhibition
in an experimental model of myocardial infarction and subsequently in
patients with recent myocardial infarction, provided a new rationale for the
use of these inhibitors for chronic heart failure.
However, this apparent prevention of left ventricular dilatation by ACE inhibitors
is less apparent in patients with
congestive heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (decreased
ejection fraction) than in patients with
recent myocardial infarction. Furthermore, the unexpected finding that long-term
ACE inhibition decreases the incidence
of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease
and an already reduced systolic function,
suggested the hypothesis that vascular protection may provide most of the clinical
benefits of ACE inhibitors. This
hypothesis was successfully tested by demonstrating a lower incidence of cardiovascular
events in high-risk vascular
patients randomized to long-term ACE inhibition with ramipril. Accordingly,
the current rationale behind the use of
ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure is largely that of vascular
protection.
KEY WORD
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, left ventricular remodeling, vascular protection, chronic heart failure.
| |
MSSM Home | Back Issues | Indexes | Search | Journal Home | |